

Explainer
Published
Updated
Early in 1963 the then Government announced they would grant mining leases for bauxite mining in land excised from the Arnhem Land reserve. Local Elders were concerned that not only was this done without their consultation or input, but that it could have a severe impact on access to sacred sites within affected areas.
Opposition members who were also on the Federal Council for Aboriginal Advancement visited Yirrkala and recommended to the Elders that they document their concerns and call for a Committee to hear the concerns of Yirrkala residents prior to granting the leases.
Two bark petitions were painted with important distinctions in both the text and the artwork. One was written in Yolngu Matha and the other in English, and the two distinct paintings that framed the petitions were representative of the two Yolngu moieties, Dhuwa and Yirritja.
As a result of the petition the Select Committee on Grievances of Yirrkala Aborigines, Arnhem Land Reserve, was established. It acknowledged the rights the Yolngu set out in the petitions and recommended to Parliament on 29 October 1963 that compensation for loss of livelihood be paid, that sacred sites be protected, and that an ongoing parliamentary committee continue to monitor the mining projects.
Milirrpum, a signatory on the Bark Petition, gave evidence at the hearings on Tuesday 1st October 1963.
The Chairman asked:
“Do you think it is a good idea for the mining people to come here and work on some part of the area? Do you think that this will bring advantages to your people?”
Milirrpum replied:
“We did not know what people came here. First of all aboriginal people not get whisper nowhere. Other people really plunder this country – only take from this country. We did not know, first of all, why they came. But later on, we soon get a little bit of word. But all Aboriginal people did not get the word from mining people to mission. After that, when mission people get a little bit of word from mining people and mission tell us they went to all the marks. After mission tell us, we were worrying a little bit about our country. All Aboriginal people did not know anything about why they mine bauxite. That is why the people little bit worry. They see men plunder this country. We were worrying about our children and our country. We want to hold all the country. All generations of our people here. The people here little bit worry because of all this whisper, and that is why we people come together this afternoon for this business.
If this country taken, we want something else from mining people. This Aboriginal people’s place. We want to hold this country. We do not want to lose this country. That is how the people are worrying about this country. We want to get more room for our hunting and our fishing, because later on we got more people. Our children are to come. All my children at school in this country. They want to hold this country. We fought the law for our children for all this country. Please, we do not want to lose this country. We stand on this country. The Aboriginal people were the first Australians here. Then you people come along. Please, that is my word I am telling you. That is my last word. Thank you.”
Despite these actions, it was considered a failure by many Yolngu as leases were still granted to Nabalco to mine bauxite and establish a township. Yolngu leaders launched the Gove Land Rights Case in the Northern Territory Supreme Court in December 1968 which did not succeed, but in handing down his judgement, Justice Blackburn acknowledged that although Yolngu law was a legitimate system of law, "the doctrine of communal native title contended for by the natives did not form, and never had formed, part of the law of any part of Australia. Such a doctrine has no place in a settled colony except under express statutory provisions."
Bukudjulni gonga'yurri napurrunha Yirrkalalili yulnunha malanha Balamumu, Narrkala, Gapiny, Miliwurrwurr, nanapurru dhuwala mala, ga Djapu, Mangalili, Madarrpa, Magarrwanalmirri, Djambarrpuynu, Marrkulu, Gumaitj, Galpu, Dhaluangu, Wangurri, Warramirri, Naymil, Riritjingu malamanapanmirri djal dhunapa.
Dhuwala napurru yolnu mala yurru liyamirriyama bitjan bili marr yurru napurru nha gonga'yunna wagarr'yu.
To the honourable speaker and members of the House of Representatives in Parliament assembled.
The Humble Petition of the Undersigned Aboriginal people of Yirrkala being members of the Balamumum, Narrkala, Gapiny, Miliwurrwurr people and Djapu, Mangalili, Madarrpa, Magarrwanalinirri, Djambarrpuynu, Gumaitj, Marrakulu, Galpu, Dhaluangu, Wangurri, Warramirri, Naymil, Rirritjingu tribes respectfully showeth.
And your petitioners as in duty bound will ever pray God to help you and us.
The 1968 bark painting by Dundiwuy Wanambi shows the figure of Wuyal standing on the hill he named Nhulunbuy carrying his axe and wearing a madayin object around his neck. His shovel-nosed spear and woomera are beside him. A typed petition, signed by sixteen men and one woman, was attached to the back of the bark in which they asked that the town be named Nhulunbuy, the name of a nearby sacred hill.
This petition was successful, and the township is still known as Nhulunbuy today.
The 1988 Barunga Statement, written on bark, called for self-determination, land rights, compensation and Indigenous rights.
It was presented to then Prime Minister Bob Hawke at the first Barunga Festival by Galarrwuy Yunipingu and Wenton Rabuntja. Mr Hawke signed the statement and promised he would pursue a treaty by 1990.
That didn't eventuate, and Yothu Yindi's song 'Treaty' documents the disappointment.
Back in 1988All those talking politicians...But promises can disappearJust like writing in the sand
We, the Indigenous owners and occupiers of Australia, call on the Australian Government and people to recognise our rights:
We call on the Commonwealth to pass laws providing:
We call on the Australian Government to support Aborigines in the development of an international declaration of principles for indigenous rights, leading to an international covenant.
And we call on the Commonwealth Parliament to negotiate with us a Treaty recognising our prior ownership, continued occupation and sovereignty and affirming our human rights and freedom.
This bark petition was handed to Prime Minister John Howard in 1998 with the aim of starting a diplomatic dialogue between political leaders of the Yolngu people and the Australian Parliament and obtain respect for customary law.
However, unlike the 1963 bark petitions, the two Elcho Island and Yirrkala 1998 petitions did not meet the requirements needed to be accepted as petitions as it was presented to the Prime Minister and not the House of representatives.
Linguist, anthropologist, and author, Richard Trudgen, said that Mr Howard did not respect the document. “It seems that John Howard did not take it seriously and it got stored away in a place where the gift collection was kept. The petition was not even tabled in Parliament. The Elders/political leaders waited for years to receive some form of response but it never came.”
Letter to the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia on traditional Yolngu Law
We, the undersigned, are dalkarra and djirrikay (the political representatives and leaders) of our sovereign clan/nations comprising all the Yolngu (Aboriginal people) within this Miwatj region of North-East Arnhem Land.
We bring to you our diplomatic request
from: the Njarra' /traditional Parliaments of our clan/nation estates
to: the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
We request that you recognise:
The colonisation of this land and the imposition of a foreign system of law has not prevented Yolngu from holding, maintaining and continuing to assent to our traditional system of law. This is our Common Law right which the High Court of Australia has partially recognised. As citizens our rights must be protected at law.
In 1967 the Commonwealth of Australia belatedly recognised our citizenship of this land, Australia. However, we were already citizens of this land, recognised by our Madayin.
In the face of many imposed obstacles and pressures we still continue to educate our children and future leaders, manage our estates, engage in economic and diplomatic exchanges between clans/nations, discipline offenders, care for our sick and elderly and practice hospitality to foreigers who live on or visit our yirralka (estates).
There must be dialogue between the two systems of law because Yolngu law, like your law, is based on the key principles of mawaya (peace and justice), dhapirrk (consistency between different levels of law) and wana-lupthun (the assent of the rom-watanju walal/citizens, to those laws).
We extend to you, the Honourable Leaders of the Commonwealth of Australia, our invitation to come to a meeting where we can discuss these issues in much greater depth so that together we can forge a partnrship of co-operation and dialogue based on mutual trust and respect for each other's law. Without this recognition we will live in perpetual dependence in this land that is ours by birthright, silenced and oppressed by a foreign system of law.
Presented to the Prime Minister, the Hon. John Howard MHR, at Yirrkala on 27 February 1998 on behalf of the following clan/nations of the Miwatj region:
Rirratjinju, Gumatj, Galpu, Madarrpa, Djapu, Manjgalili, Marrakulu, Munyuku, Dhalamju, Dhudi-Djapu, Wangurri, Datiwuy, Njaymil, Djambarrpuymju, Warramiri, Goulumala, Ritharrmju, Marranju, Dhapuynju, Gupapuynju, Djarrwark.
After the Landmark Apology to the Stolen Generations of Australia was delivered by the Australian Parliment, a bark petition was presented to the then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd by Galarrwuy Yunupingu as a part of a bungul in Arnhem Land. It requested full recognition of Indigenous peoples rights in the Australian Constitution, asking to given safe and healthy lives to Indigenous Australians. It was the first time that a Prime Minister and their federal cabinet had met in an Indigenous community.
Like the 1998 petition, as it was presented to the Prime Minister as head of the Government and not to the House of Representatives, it was not presented as an official petition to the House.
We, the united clans of East Arnhem land, through our most senior delak, do humbly petition you, the 26th Prime Minister of Australia, in your capacity as the first amongst equals in the Australian Parliament, and as the chief adviser to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, to secure within the Australian Constitution the recognition and protection of our full and complete right to:
These rights are self-evident.
These rights are fundamental to our place within the Australian nation.
We ask for your leadership to have the Commonwealth Parliament start the process of recognition of these rights through serious constitutional reform.
Nhanaburru, wangkanmala bapurru dhimirrunguru, arnhemland, nganaburrungu ngurrngu delak mala, nganthun yukurra nhuna 26th Prime Minister Australia-wu. Nhukala ganydjarr'yu nhunhi nhe ngurrungu walalangu malangura nhuma walala rrambangi, Australian Parliament-ngura, ga ngurrungu Dharuk-mirri nhangu Garraywu Queen Elizabeth-gu, yurru nhandarryun-marama djinawa-lili Australian-dhu luku-wu rom-dhu yurru dharangan ga galmuma nganapurrungu dhangang ga bukmak nha-mala nhanapurrungu:
Dhuwalanydja rom dhuwalana bilina.
Dhuwalanydja rom wawungu wanga-wuy ngandarryunmarama Australian-gala bapurrulili.
Nganapurru marrliliyama nhukula ngurru-warryun-narayngu, marr yurru Commonwealth Parliament ngurru warrwun ga dharangan dhuwala rom ga marryuwak gumana dhayutakumana lukunydja rom.